Rendered model of the final VLJ design: the SWARM Palanquin
The objective of this project was to satisfy the MR&O requirements for the design of a Very Light Jet (VLJ). Typically the jets in this category weigh approximately 10,000 lbs, carry 4-8 passengers, and cruise around 40000 ft. The image on the left is a render of the VLJ my team and I designed. The following details were outlined in the project outline by the stakeholders:
Product Vision
Low acquisition & operating Cost
Provide year-round service to passengers and/or freight
Sustainability
Airframe
Airframe life greater than 20 years
Ease of maintenance & repair
Environmental friendliness
Efficient operation of aircraft
Unrendered CAD model of the final VLJ design
Requirements & Objectives
Capability to carry 6 passengers at least 1,000 nm as per NBAA IFR max payload range
Good handling qualities under various flight conditions
Aesthetics; Aircraft configuration & number of engines
Airworthiness
With a team of 12 members, this project was achieved within three months. The teams and roles were divided as follows: Chief Integrator, Aerodynamics, Performance, Masterlines, Stability & Control, Weight & Balance, Loads & Dynamics, Marketing & Cost, Interiors, Conceptual Design & Sizing, and Systems. My role in this project was to lead the aerodynamics and systems teams. The initial step was conceptualizing the design and determining sizing requirements as a team. This required conducting trade studies into existing VLJ aircraft in the market such as the Cirrus Vision, Honda Jet, Cessna Citation Mustang, and Embraer Phenom 100. My role in this analysis was to compare the Honda Jet's performance against other VLJs. Upon completion of the preliminary designing of the jet, my focus shifted to designing the aerodynamics and systems of the aircraft.
The following images illustrate the work completed to design the VLJs aerodynamics. The tools used to conduct the required design work include airfoil & empennage analysis in XFLR5 and wing analysis in ANSYS Fluent. With each iteration, the design required refining the wing model as well as meshing the wing geometry based on updated geometrical and performance parameters. Due to hardware constraints, the meshes were not refined to a high degree, resulting in discrepancies in expected aerodynamic values such as the total produced lift, quarter chord moment coefficient, and pressure distribution. However the parameters were compared to existing VLJ wing data to ensure approximations were within an appropriate magnitude. Using the Lifting Line Theory method (LLT), the aerodynamic coefficients of the airfoil were computed. This method is an aerodynamics mathematical model that predicts the lift of a finite wing using the concept of circulation and the Kutta-Joukowski theorem.
Drag polar for the NACA 2820
Sample wing airfoil flap analysis
CAD model of the VLJ wing
Wing vortices analysis on horizontal stabilizer
CFD analysis of wing in airflow using ANSYS Fluent
Drag buildup of aircraft components
Using reference textbooks and existing data, I developed an analysis of various parameters to determine the sizing of the wing, empennage, and airfoil. For instance recognizing the implication of stall speed during landing is essential in determining the airfoil shape and required flap angles. Furthermore, determining the required data in compliance to FAR23 airworthiness standards was imperative to a successful design. A critical factor in the design of the wing required additional considerations such as structural implications. Designing a thin airfoil raises concerns regarding the structural integrity of the wing. The wing analysis required focus on crucial phases of flight such as takeoff and landing where the integrity of the aircraft is at the highest risk.
One of the priorities in our design was to ensure a short takeoff & landing as part of our marketing strategy for the VLJ. With the large size of the wing planform area, the aircraft has a landing distance of 2615 ft and takeoff field length of 2071 ft. In addition, winglets were added to reduce the drag of the aircraft and improve the fuel efficiency despite the consequences of increased weight, aircraft instability due to a spiral divergence mode, and higher acquisition cost. Other scenarios examined included rotor burst design and system redundancy to improve the safety of the aircraft.
The systems design for the aircraft was separated into the following subsystems: hydraulics system, environmental control system, electrical system, flight control system, avionics system, fuel system, and engine control system. My role as the main focal point was to design these subsystems while accounting for dimensional and weight constraints of the aircraft following FAR23 airworthiness standards. One of the design challengers included a conflict between the electrical system and structural team. The structures team had a definitive volume for the placement of electrical buses and required a volume estimate for the electrical bus. This required a thorough analysis of standard wire lengths and gauges used in VLJ aircraft to ensure compliance with industry specifications and optimize weight and performance. The evaluation considered factors such as current-carrying capacity and mechanical durability to select the appropriate wire dimensions.
Electrical system of the aircraft
System architecture of the aircraft
Rotorburst analysis of the aircraft
Rotor burst occurs during rotor failure where the blade fragments burst, impacting other components of the aircraft. The general analysis considered an initial 5° cone where the energy of the burst is classified to have infinite energy and will cut through anything. The second cone of 15° is classified as finite energy such that damage to the airframe can be minimized. Given the over-wing nacelle configuration, it was essential to minimize the risk of such an accident. Systems that required redundancy for such a scenario included the flight controls system, fuel system, engine control system, and electrical system.
The SWARM Palanquin was designed with key engineering principles to stand out in the VLJ market, meeting specific requirements for passenger capacity, weight, and performance. Through a comprehensive tradeoff analysis of existing VLJs, an over-wing engine configuration was selected, offering benefits such as reduced risk of foreign object debris (FOD) enabling takeoff on unpaved runways, improved aerodynamic performance, and flexible tail design. With a maximum takeoff weight of 10,500 lbs, it achieves a long-range cruise of 1,000 nautical miles at maximum payload. The jet excels in short takeoff and landing (STOL) performance, requiring just 2,071 ft for takeoff and 2,615 ft for landing. It offers two interior configurations, comfortably seating 1 plus 5 passengers, completed with a lavatory. The VLJ design satisfied the stakeholder requirements of the project of having a passenger capacity of 6 passengers, an MTOW of approximately 10000 lb, and achieving a range of 1000 nm in long range cruise.
Check out my capstone project repository on GitHub for project & code samples.